Baseline first.
Measure the workflow before changing it.
Wytegate maps, builds, and deploys controlled AI workflows across the tools you already use — so your team can move faster, handle more volume, and keep judgment where it belongs.
Measure the workflow before changing it.
Approval, escalation, and stop paths are defined upfront.
The first route proves its place before the scope grows.
You do not need to be overwhelmed to benefit. Stable workflows can become faster, less expensive, and easier to scale before demand forces another hire or another layer of tools.
Increase repeatable output without making headcount the only way to support growth.
Move approved work from trigger to outcome without waiting for the next manual handoff.
Reserve skilled attention for judgment while rules handle the stable, repeatable path.
Make ownership, exceptions, and current system state visible across the tools already in use.
Tools give your team one more thing to log into. An operating layer sits underneath the business and executes approved workflows — answering routine requests, preparing follow-ups, and delivering the numbers with clear controls.
Scoped to your workflows and connected to your stack. Start with the highest-leverage route, prove the controls, and expand only when the first system earns its place.
Illustrative interfaces · simulated workflow dataRoute routine messages through defined reply, update, and scheduling paths, with ambiguous or sensitive cases sent to a person.
Prepare proposals, follow-ups, and campaign drafts from approved inputs, then route them through the right review and send steps.
Compile recurring metrics and surface exceptions on schedule, without rebuilding the same report by hand.
Give clients a guided way to find approved information and take the next step, with clear boundaries for what the assistant may answer.
The first review counts six dimensions of the workflow. Those counts become the statement of work, acceptance checks, and estimate before build begins.
Each trigger-to-outcome path, with explicit boundaries for what is and is not included.
Every application, API, inbox, database, file source, and destination the route touches.
Each automatic action, approval, escalation, and stop condition—with a responsible role.
Materially different edge cases and failure paths, including their fallback and owner.
Each record type read, created, updated, or retained along the proposed data path.
Agreed runtimes, accounts, repositories, documentation, and post-launch responsibilities.
Four decision paths means: automate, request approval, escalate, or stop. Exact counts, price, timeline, and acceptance criteria are confirmed only after access and feasibility are reviewed.
A workflow earns automation when it can be bounded, controlled, and verified. — not just because it repeats
A transparent path from baseline to acceptance. You know what is being built, why, who controls it, and what it is meant to improve.
We map one priority workflow, its current effort and delay, then count the routes, systems, controls, and exceptions in scope.
We define the data path, permissions, approvals, exception owners, acceptance checks, and deployment model.
We implement the agreed workflow route and connect only the systems and actions confirmed in scope.
We test against agreed cases, run in shadow mode where appropriate, and move to production after acceptance.
Mission Control can show what a workflow did, what needs review, and which routes are running or paused. The exact fields, controls, deployment, and logs are configured in scope.
Before a workflow goes live, its data path, permissions, approval points, exception routes, and accountable owner are made explicit.
Connections are designed around the minimum access the agreed workflow needs. Credential location, connected accounts, and permissions are documented.
Material actions can be routed to approval, escalation, or a stop condition. The operating owner and disable route are named before launch.
Events, outcomes, and exceptions can be logged where the selected tools and deployment support it, with useful fields agreed in scope.
Repositories, accounts, runbooks, acceptance evidence, support responsibilities, and any third-party dependencies are listed for handover.
Available controls depend on the connected tools, deployment model, and agreed scope. Security, hosting location, retention, uptime, and recovery commitments are confirmed for the specific build — never assumed from a template.
The goal is not automation theatre. It is measurable operating leverage against a baseline your team recognises.
Hiring, outsourcing, and adding software can each be the right move. These disclosed Belgium–Netherlands ranges show what each route can cost — and when a controlled workflow may offer a fourth option.
Experienced-market pay, statutory charges, common benefits, recruitment, and initial equipment. Recurring cost can be lower.
Absorbs a stable, repeatable route and surfaces exceptions. People retain judgment, relationships, and broad role ownership.
From focused content retainers to multi-channel delivery. Media spend and specialist production may be extra.
Systemises agreed production and distribution. Strategy and final editorial judgment stay with people.
Public list prices across collaboration, CRM, work management, automation, and recording. VAT and usage overages are excluded.
Connects the route across the stack. Vendor licences, model use, storage, and other third-party fees remain.
How the upper value is chosen. Each headline uses the highest defensible value found across Belgium and the Netherlands. It does not imply that one country is always more expensive, or that different scopes are directly interchangeable.
Employee range. The 2026 75th-percentile Office Manager benchmark is €4,395/month in Brussels and €4,102/month nationally in the Netherlands, so Belgium supplies the higher like-for-like salary input. The €90k Belgian and €80k Dutch figures are rounded first-year employer-cost ceilings: salary, statutory charges and holiday pay, plus allowances for common benefits, recruitment, and initial equipment. The Belgian ceiling allows for a year-end or 13th-month payment where applicable; it is not universal. Dutch premiums and pension costs vary by contract, employer, sector, and scheme. Sources: Robert Half Brussels, Robert Half Netherlands, Belgian employer contributions, Belgian holiday pay, Dutch holiday allowance, and the Dutch 2026 payroll-rate appendix. As a cross-check, the last Eurostat year available for both markets is 2024: €48.2/hour in Belgium versus €45.2/hour in the Netherlands. Belgium’s 2025 Eurostat estimate was not released, so the 2025 Dutch figure is not used for a direct comparison.
Agency range. The lower bound comes from GoldenWing. In Belgium, Brussels-based ROH Marketing publishes a €6,500 Growth retainer and says most engagements run to €15,000+ per month. In the Netherlands, Searchlab publishes €8,000+ for Full Stack and BLURR publishes up to €15,000+ for a multi-channel growth stack. The highest published value is therefore tied at €15k+; these are selected offers, not national averages or like-for-like scopes.
Software example. A low/high scenario using public prices from Google Workspace, Slack, Notion, Airtable, Asana, HubSpot, Zapier, and Loom. The same high scenario is shown for Belgium and the Netherlands; VAT is excluded. USD prices use the ECB reference rate available for 10 July 2026.
Planning references only — not quotes, national averages, or guaranteed savings. Employee ceilings are first-year estimates; agency prices marked “from” or “+” can rise with scope. VAT, media, onboarding, implementation, travel, specialist production, usage, and future pricing may be extra. Compare like-for-like scope and verify current prices.
The best starting point is a recurring, valuable workflow with enough volume to measure — and an owner empowered to improve it.
Two live examples of our product and digital execution. They demonstrate product judgment and delivery quality; operating outcomes are measured only on workflow engagements.
A direct-to-consumer product experience for custom lab-grown diamond rings, built around guided choice, product storytelling, and a clear consultation path.
View live build →A premium launch experience for the R1 compact thermal sight, translating technical product detail into an interactive commercial story.
View live build →Tije leads the client relationship and delivery. Vadim leads the systems architecture. The commercial context stays connected to the technical work from first scope to handover.
Client / 01
Your first conversation is with Tije. He clarifies the business goal, turns it into a clear operating brief, and remains your point of contact through scope, delivery, and handover.
Request a call with Tije →
Systems / 02
Vadim turns the agreed brief into the technical architecture — workflow logic, integrations, controls, exception routes, and acceptance evidence.
No sales hand-off. The people shaping the scope remain accountable for the work.
We quote after the initial review, once the highest-leverage workflow, counted scope, integrations, controls, and ownership model are clear.
Keep it running and improving. If ongoing support is included, its monitoring, response, maintenance, optimization, and change responsibilities are written into the scope.
Anything else — ask on the workflow call. Thirty minutes, no slides.
Defined workflow routes across agreed tools — such as email, chat, CRM, accounting, or spreadsheets — with controls, exception handling, acceptance checks, and an operating view where the scope calls for it.
“Owned” means the custom workflow logic, documentation, and agreed repositories or deployment accounts are placed under client control as listed in the scope. Third-party software, models, APIs, and infrastructure remain subject to their own licences, accounts, and fees. Handover responsibilities are explicit.
It is not a like-for-like comparison. A person owns judgment, relationships, and changing responsibilities. A controlled workflow is useful when a stable, repeatable route can be absorbed consistently and exceptions can go to people. The cost section shows disclosed Belgium–Netherlands first-year planning ceilings — not a promise that software replaces a role.
The timeline is determined after the initial review. It depends on route count, access, system constraints, exception families, control requirements, test evidence, and how quickly decisions can be made. We confirm milestones only after feasibility and acceptance criteria are clear.
Not necessarily. We do need an accountable internal owner, timely access to the agreed systems, and people who can make policy and exception decisions. Any technical responsibilities on your side are named during discovery.
Common examples include Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Teams, HubSpot, Salesforce, QuickBooks, Xero, Notion, Airtable, Excel, and WhatsApp. Actual feasibility depends on the available API, permissions, data quality, rate limits, commercial terms, and deployment model, so every connection is confirmed during the feasibility review.
We define the data path, access boundaries, approvals, exception owners, retention choices, traceability fields, and disable route before release. What can be guaranteed depends on the selected tools, deployment, and agreed scope; hosting location, uptime, recovery, and security commitments are therefore confirmed for the specific build.
It is priced from counted scope: workflow routes, system connections, control points, exception families, data objects, deployment responsibilities, and acceptance work. After access and feasibility are reviewed, you receive an estimate with assumptions, exclusions, third-party costs, and a change route.
Bring one recurring process and the operating goal behind it. Together, we identify the baseline, the control points, and whether a controlled build is worth pursuing.